The biggest security shift heading into 2026 isn’t a new exploit, a breakthrough vulnerability, or some yet-to-be-known attack technique. It’s access. And more specifically, how easy access the variations on gaining it are becoming to obtain, abuse, and scale. Advancements in AI are accelerating this trend at a pace most organizations aren’t structurally prepared for.
Capabilities that once belonged to highly skilled, well-funded teams are now widely available. AI can explain, generate, and adapt code at machine speed. It can reason through unfamiliar architectures, identify likely failure points, and help troubleshoot broken implementations in real time. Entry-level hackers can punch far above their weight, not because they’re more talented, but because the tooling around them is dramatically more capable. And while quantum computing isn’t here yet, its shadow is already forcing hard decisions about cryptography, data lifetimes, and architectural longevity.
The common thread across all of this is simple: the cost of being dangerous is dropping fast.
AI Amplification of Existing Attacks
Systems like Anthropic’s Claude aren’t “hacking tools” in the traditional sense. They aren’t designed to find zero-days or automatically compromise systems. What makes them disruptive is something more subtle and more impactful: they act as accelerants.
Claude can read unfamiliar code, explain protocols, reason about system architecture, and help troubleshoot broken or incomplete implementations. For engineers, that’s a productivity multiplier. For attackers, it removes one of the biggest historical barriers to entry: understanding how a system is supposed to work before figuring out how to break.
This proves a hacker doesn’t need deep domain expertise to get moving. They can ask an AI how a system is designed, where similar systems tend to fail, and what assumptions defenders usually make. That kind of contextual understanding used to take years of experience, hands-on exposure, or direct mentorship. Now it’s available on demand, at scale.
AI doesn’t hand over zero-days. It hands over clarity. And clarity shortens the distance between curiosity and impact.
This shift doesn’t replace skilled hackers. It multiplies them. Experienced attackers move faster, and less-experienced ones reach effectiveness far sooner. The friction between “I don’t know how this works” and “I can test this idea” keeps shrinking. And that compression is where risk lives.
Young Hackers Gaining Real Power
In 2026, inexperienced hackers or so-called “script kiddies,” who rely on tools and code developed by others, will no longer be limited to nuisance-level attacks or noisy scanning. A less-experienced attacker today can combine AI-assisted code generation with public tooling and autonomous feedback loops to dramatically increase their attack span.
They don’t need to understand every layer of the stack in detail. They need to know how to prompt, run, observe, and iterate. When something fails, AI explains why. When a tool partially works, AI suggests how to modify it and can take simple, directed actions to adapt. When an environment looks unfamiliar, AI helps adapt existing scripts to new conditions. The attacker learns while attacking by the compounded wealth of knowledge from both defensive and offensive playbooks.
The result isn’t necessarily more sophisticated attacks in the classic sense. It’s more attempts, more variations, and more edge cases being exercised, often unintentionally. Defenses that rely on attackers being sloppy, slow, or predictable stop working when iteration becomes cheap and continuous.
This is what “lightweight attackers with bigger guns” actually look like in practice. Not genius, but relentless capability applied at scale.
Security analysts have observed that AI isn’t just making attacks faster — it’s fundamentally lowering the bar so that even attackers with minimal experience can automate, scale, and customize their operations in ways that traditional defenses struggle to keep up with.
“AI models, especially large language models (LLMs), make attack development faster, cheaper, and more accessible to less experienced hackers,” according to a recent analysis of AI-enabled cyberattacks from OPSWAT.
Quantum Is the Outlier — and That’s Why it Matters
Quantum computing won’t break the internet in 2026. Even Google CEO Sundar Pichai has been clear that cryptographically relevant quantum systems are still some distance away. In a recent interview with BBC, Pichai compared the current state of quantum computing to where AI was roughly five years ago, i.e. very real progress, accelerating investment, but not yet at a true breaking point.
“The progress is so exciting,” Pichai said in the interview. “I would say quantum is where maybe AI was five years ago. So I think in five years from now we’ll be going through a very exciting phase in quantum, and we are investing with a view towards that.”
But security planning doesn’t operate on headlines. It operates on timelines, and this makes quantum attacks the looming threat over the next few years.
The real quantum risk is already present in the form of harvest now, decrypt later. Nation-state actors and other adversaries can collect encrypted traffic today and simply wait for future capabilities to catch up. Data with long lifetimes, infrastructure credentials, healthcare records, industrial systems, backdoor controls, and government communications, are all especially exposed.
Post-quantum cryptography isn’t a switch you flip once a breakthrough happens. It’s an architectural transition that takes years to plan, test, and deploy. Organizations that wait for certainty will find themselves trying to migrate under pressure, with limited options and higher risk.
While quantum may not affect every organization at the same time, when it does arrive, the impact will be severe for those who haven’t prepared. Traditional, classical encrypted-based systems will be compromised quickly, with one success opening the doors to further penetrations into previously secure systems.
The Architectural Reality
Across AI-enabled hackers, lower-skilled adversaries with greater reach, and long-horizon quantum threats, the lesson is the same: security can no longer depend on obscurity, perimeter trust, or the assumption that attackers are less capable than you are.
The tools to probe, test, and stress your systems are already everywhere. Attackers don’t need direct access to your internal network if your architecture relies on implicit trust and inherited access.
Architectures that hold up in this environment minimize implicit trust, reduce blast radius, and assume compromise as a starting condition rather than a failure state. Systems built around static boundaries and a “trusted inside” model don’t fail gracefully. When they break, they tend to break catastrophically.
This is why zero trust isn’t just a buzzword, it’s an architectural principle.
At ZeroTier, this reality shows up in how modern networks are built: identity-first, cryptographically secured, and segmented by default. Access is explicit and scoped, not inherited from location, IP address, or network adjacency. When compromise happens, it can be contained rather than cascading.
The shift already underway is as much about timing as it is about technology. The organizations that treat AI-enabled attacks and post-quantum risk as future problems will be forced into reactive decisions later, often under pressure. The ones engaging now — redesigning access models, reducing implicit trust, and preparing teams for continuous adversarial pressure — are building optionality. They’re buying time, flexibility, and resilience before those capabilities are no longer optional.
2026 won’t reward clever defenses. It will reward resilient ones — small trust domains, minimal exposure, and networks designed to fail safely. In a world where access keeps getting easier, resilience isn’t just an advantage. It’s the difference between containment and catastrophe.
Want to learn how ZeroTier’s resilient, identity-first networking limits access by design? Request a demo today.
Want a deeper breakdown of the terminology? Our networking and cybersecurity glossary has you covered.